Investment treaty cases -grouped thematically

Subject area

Annulment, correction and revision of awards

• Alapli Elektrik B.V. v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/13) (www.practicallaw.com/8-576-9925) - (ICSID; annulment)
• AWG Group v Argentina (UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
• Azurix Corp v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12) (Annulment proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/9-500-1617) - (Annulment proceedings; ICSID; shareholder).
• Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12) (www.practicallaw.com/5-380-2896) - (Request for annulment; stay of enforcement; security).
• CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/8) (www.practicallaw.com/9-376-5236) - (Partial annulment; ICSID award).
• Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/97/3) (Annulment Proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/8-384-1491) - (Stay of enforcement; ICSID annulment proceedings).
• Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/9) - (Annulment; stay of enforcement).
• Daimler Financial Services AG v Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1 (www.practicallaw.com/9-595-8925) - (Annulment; Jurisdiction; ICSID; MFN).
• Enron Creditors Recovery Corp, Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/3) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0293) - (Annulment; defence of necessity).
• Enron Corporation Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case Number ARB /01/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-383-6107) - (Annulment; stay of enforcement; security).
• Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v The Philippines (ICSID Case No ARB/03/25) (www.practicallaw.com/1-504-9581) - (Annulment; right to be heard).
• Gold Reserve Inc. v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/09/1 (www.practicallaw.com/0-594-4725) - (Corrections to award; Article 56(1); ICSID)
• Helnan International Hotels A/S v Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/05/19) (Annulment proceeding) - (Annulment; exhaustion of local remedies).
• Impregilo SpA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/07/17) (Annulment Proceeding (www.practicallaw.com/2-556-5785)) - (ICSID; application for annulment, MFN).
• Industria Nacional de Alimentos SA v Peru (ICSID Case no ARB 03/4) (www.practicallaw.com/5-376-3673) - (Application for annulment; treaty interpretation; manifest excess of powers).
• Kardassopoulos and Fuchs v Georgia (ICSID Case Nos ARB/05/18 and ARB/07/15) (www.practicallaw.com/9-504-0906) - (Stay of enforcement; pending annulment proceedings).
• MCI Power Group LC and New Turbine Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/03/6) (Annulment Proceeding) - (Annulment refused; manifest excess of power; failure to state reasons).
• Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/06/11) (Stay of enforcement; continuation, annulment).
• Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11) (www.practicallaw.com/2-583-0247) - (Enforcement; pending annulment; stay).
• Republic of Kazakhstan v Rumeli Telekom AS and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri AS (ICSID Case No ARB/05/16) - (Annulment proceedings; Article 52 ICSID Convention).
• RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/05/14 (Annulment proceeding)) - (ICSID; annulment; jurisdiction; attempt to reopen evidence).
• Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/02/16) (Annulment proceeding) - (ICSID; annulment; manifest excess of powers).
• Sempra Energy International v Argentine Republic (ARB/02/16) (www.practicallaw.com/6-383-8786) - (Stay of enforcement lifted; ICSID).
• Sempra Energy International v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/12/16) (www.practicallaw.com/1-385-2930) - (Conditional stay of enforcement).
• Suez, Societad General de Aguas de Barcelona SA and InterAgua Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/03/17) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
• RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case ARB/05/14) (Annulment Proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/9-506-1084) - (Order for costs; discontinuance; annulment proceedings).
• Victor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No ARB/98/2) (www.practicallaw.com/0-541-7866) (Request for supplementary decision; annulment).
• Victor Pey Casado and Foundation "Presidente Allende" v Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2) (www.practicallaw.com/8-523-5829) (Partial annulment; departure from a fundamental rule of procedure).

CAFTA

• Railroad Development Corp v Guatemala (ICSID Case No ARB/07/23) (Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction, CAFTA Article 10.20.5) (www.practicallaw.com/3-384-1078) - (CAFTA; scope of waiver).
• Pac Rim Cayman LLC v Republic of El Salvador (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/12) (www.practicallaw.com/1-519-8260) (CAFTA; jurisdiction; denial of benefits).
• Pac Rim Cayman LLC v The Republic of El Salvador (ICSID Case No ARB/09/12). Decision on the Respondent's Preliminary Objections under CAFTA Articles 10.20.4 and 10.20.5) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0306) - (CAFTA; Preliminary objections).
• Railroad Development Corporation v Republic of Guatemala (Award, 29 June 2012) (www.practicallaw.com/9-520-3234)(DR-CAFTA; minimum standard of treatment).

Challenges to arbitrators, counsel and experts

• Abaclat and others (Case formerly known as Beccara and others) v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/2-519-1215) - (ICSID Convention; disqualification of arbitrator).
• Abaclat and others (Case formerly known as Beccara and others) v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/1-557-2946) - (Arbitrator challenge, ICSID Convention, Application for disqualification).
• Alpha Projektholding GmbH v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/07/16) - (Arbitrator challenge; Article 57 ICSID Convention).
• Blue Bank International & Trust (Barbados) Ltd v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/20) (www.practicallaw.com/5-551-3686)(Arbitrator challenge; Disqualification).
• Caratube International Oil Company LLP and another v Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No ARB/113/13) (www.practicallaw.com/1-563-5128) - (Disqualification of arbitrator; ICSID).
  Cemex Caracas Investments BV and another v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/15) - (Arbitrator challenge; time limit).
• Cia de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/97/3) (Annulment Proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/8-503-0601) - (ICSID; duties of arbitrators; conflicts of interest).
• ConocoPhillips Company et al v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case no ARB/07/30) (www.practicallaw.com/6-518-4171) (Arbitrator challenge; merger of law firm).
• ConocoPhillips Company et al v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case no ARB/07/30) (www.practicallaw.com/4-567-9446) (Arbitrator challenge; Impartiality; ICSID).
• ED & F International SA and ors v Argentina, (ICSID Case No ARB/03/23) (www.practicallaw.com/1-383-9991) - (Challenge to arbitrator; arbitrator independence; impartiality).
• Flughafen Zürich AG and Gestión e Ingenería IDC SA v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/19) (www.practicallaw.com/0-521-5547) (Application to disqualify expert).
• Hrvatsa Elektroprivreda, dd v Republic of Slovenia (ICSID Case No ARB/05/24) (www.practicallaw.com/9-384-3116) - (Barrister excluded; arbitrator; same set of Chambers).
• İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/24) (www.practicallaw.com/5-576-1266) - (ICSID; disqualification; arbitrators and appointments).
• OPIC Karimum Corporation v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/14) (www.practicallaw.com/3-506-4207) - (Arbitrator challenges; multiple appointments).
• Participaciones Inversiones Portuarias SARL v Gabonese Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/08/17) - (Arbitrator challenge; impartiality).
• Perenco Ecuador Limited v The Republic of Ecuador & Empresa Estatal Petroleos del Ecuador (PCA Case No IR-2009/1) - (Arbitrator challenge; impartiality and independence).
• Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Europe v The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/12/13) (www.practicallaw.com/0-525-1229) (Challenge to arbitrator; independence and impartiality).
• Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Interagua Servicios Integrales de Aqua S.A. v Argentine Republic (Case No ARB/03/17) Decision on the Proposal for the Disqualification (www.practicallaw.com/1-379-8325) - (Challenge to arbitrator; arbitrator independence/impartiality; ICSID).
• Suez and others v Argentina (Case Nos ARB/03/19 and ARB/03/17) (www.practicallaw.com/0-382-1859) - (Challenge to arbitrator; independence; impartiality; ICSID).
• Tidewater Inc and others v Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/5) (www.practicallaw.com/2-504-9156) - (ICSID; arbitrator challenge; multiple appointments).
• The Rompetrol Group NV v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/3) - (Challenge to legal representatives; no power to remove counsel).
• Universal Compression International Holdings SLU v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/9) (www.practicallaw.com/6-506-3843) - (Arbitrator challenge; multiple appointments).
• Urbaser SA and another v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/27) (Decision on Claimants' Proposal to Disqualify) (www.practicallaw.com/2-503-0623) - (Challenge to arbitrator; published articles; awards).
• Vito G Gallo v Government of Canada (14 October 2009) - (NAFTA; Challenge to arbitrator; impartiality and independence).

Claims manifestly without legal merit

• Brandes Investment Partners, LP v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/3) - (Jurisdiction; Rule 41(5); manifestly without legal merit).
• Cementownia "Nowa Huta" SA v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No Arb(AF)/06/2) - (Fraudulent claim dismissed).
• Emmis International Holding, BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/9-525-6915) - (Manifestly without legal merit; Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules).
• Global Trading Resource Corp and Globex International Inc v Ukraine (ICSID Case ARB/09/11) (www.practicallaw.com/2-504-1645) - (Rule 41(5) ICSID Arbitration Rules; claims manifestly without legal merit).
• MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc v Republic of Croatia (ICSID Case No ARB/13/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-592-7586) (Claims manifestly without legal merit; ICSID; Rule 41(5)).
• PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd. v Independent State of Papua New Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/33 (www.practicallaw.com/8-588-8872) - (ICSID; Rule 41.5 ICSID Arbitration Rules; claims manifestly without legal merit).
• RSM Production Corporation and others v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/10/6) (Award) (10 December 2010) (www.practicallaw.com/1-504-2462) - (Rule 41.5 ICSID Arbitration Rules; claims were manifestly without legal merit).
• Trans-global Petroleum Inc v Jordan (ICSID Case no ARB/07/25) (www.practicallaw.com/0-382-5678) - (Rule 41(5) ICSID Arbitration Rules; manifestly without legal merit).

Class actions

• Abaclat and others v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-507-4388) - (Jurisdiction; class actions).
• Ambiente Ufficio SpA and others (formerly known as Giordano Alpi and others) v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/08/09) (www.practicallaw.com/5-524-1407) (Jurisdiction; multi-party; class; collective).

Costs

• ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (ICSID Case No ARB/08/2) (Annulment proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/5-506-9044) - (Order for costs; discontinued annulment proceedings).
• David Minnotte & Robert Lewis v Republic of Poland, (ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/10/1) (www.practicallaw.com/9-586-9825) - (ICSID; BIT; Interpretation; Costs award).
• Piero Foresti and others v Republic of South Africa (ICSID Case No ARB (AF) /07/1) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0071) - (Costs; discontinuance of ICSID proceedings).
• Quadrant Pacific Growth Fund LP and Canasco Holdings Inc v Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/08/1) - (Costs decision; procedural order).
• RSM Production Corporation v Saint Lucia (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/10) (www.practicallaw.com/8-579-3586) (Security for costs).

Damages

• Occidental Petroleum Corporation and another v Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/06/11) (www.practicallaw.com/8-521-8679) (Damages; farmout agreement).

Defence of necessity

• AWG Group v Argentina (UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
• Continental Casualty Company v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/09) (www.practicallaw.com/5-383-2619) - (Necessity defence; BIT).
• Enron Corporation, Ponderosa Assets L.P. v Argentine Republic (Award) (22 May 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/2-366-1973) - (Defence of necessity; BIT).
• Enron Creditors Recovery Corp, Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/3) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0293) - (Annulment; defence of necessity).
• National Grid plc v Argentine Republic (Final Award) (3 November 2008) (www.practicallaw.com/3-385-1374) - (Necessity defence; ILC Articles on State Responsibility; UNCITRAL).
• Suez, Societad General de Aguas de Barcelona SA and InterAgua Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/03/17) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).

Effective means of asserting claim

• Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v The Republic of Ecuador (UNCITRAL arbitration) (Partial Award on the Merits) (30 March 2010) - (Breach of BIT; effective means of asserting claim).
• White Industries Australia Ltd v Republic of India (UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/4-518-2521) - (Delays; effective means of asserting claims and enforcing rights)

Energy Charter Treaty

• AES Summit Generation Ltd and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft v Republic of Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/07/22) (www.practicallaw.com/8-503-5364) - (Energy Charter Treaty; EU law).
• Europe Cement Investment & Trade S.A. v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/07/2) (www.practicallaw.com/3-422-4132) - (Energy Charter Treaty (ECT); fraudulent claim).
• Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 226) - (Energy Charter Treaty; provisional application).
• Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 226) (www.practicallaw.com/0-576-3965) - (UNCITRAL; arbitral awards; Energy Charter Treaty).
• Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No ARB/03/24) (www.practicallaw.com/9-384-9825) - (Energy Charter Treaty; fraudulent misrepresentation).
• Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 228) - (Energy Charter Treaty; provisional application).
• Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 228) (www.practicallaw.com/0-576-3965) - (UNCITRAL; arbitral awards; Energy Charter Treaty).
• Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 227) - (Energy Charter Treaty; provisional application).
• Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 227) (www.practicallaw.com/0-576-3965) - (UNCITRAL; arbitral awards; Energy Charter Treaty).

EU issues

• AES Summit Generation Ltd and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft v Republic of Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/07/22) (www.practicallaw.com/8-503-5364) - (Energy Charter Treaty; EU law).
• Eastern Sugar BV (Netherlands) v The Czech Republic (UNCITRAL ad hoc arbitration SCC No 088/2004) (www.practicallaw.com/9-378-9464) - (EU accession; BIT).
• European Commission v Republic of Slovakia [2011] EUECJ (Case C-264/09) (www.practicallaw.com/5-505-3670) - (EC Treaty; investment contract).

Expropriation

• Achmea BV v The Slovak Republic (PCA Case No. 2013-12) (www.practicallaw.com/5-571-6207) - (BIT; expropriation; fair and equitable treatment).
• Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter and others v. Republic of Zimbabwe (ICSID Case No ARB/05/6) (www.practicallaw.com/2-385-8615) - (BIT; expropriation; measure of damages).
• Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Limited v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No ARB/05/22) (www.practicallaw.com/1-382-9553) - (Expropriation; breach of BIT; damages).
• Compania de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no ARB/97/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-376-3139) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation).
• Emmis International Holding, BV v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/7-566-3731) - (Expropriation; BIT; Jurisdiction; Contractual right).
• Glamis Gold Ltd v USA (UNCITRAL) (NAFTA) (www.practicallaw.com/6-386-6816) - (NAFTA; expropriation; breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard).
• RosInvestCo UK Ltd v Russian Federation (SCC arbitration V (079/2005) (www.practicallaw.com/6-504-4411) - (Expropriation; BIT).
• Saipem SpA v The People's Republic of Bangladesh (ICSID Case No ARB/05/7) (www.practicallaw.com/9-386-3562) - (Court intervention; expropriation).
• Venezuela Holdings and others v. the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27) (www.practicallaw.com/5-585-2186) - (Fair and equitable treatment; expropriation; compensation).

Fair and equitable treatment

• Arif v Republic of Moldova (ICSID Case No ARB/11/23) (www.practicallaw.com/2-525-7447) - (Breach of fair and equitable treatment standard; Restitution and compensation).
• ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (ICSID Case No ARB/08/2) - (Inadmissible claim; ratione temporis; fair and equitable treatment; legitimate expectations).
• Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret VE Sanayi A.S. v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No ARB/03/29) - (Contract and treaty claims; MFN; fair and equitable treatment).
• Compania de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no ARB/97/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-376-3139) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation).
• Hochtief AG v the Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31) (www.practicallaw.com/1-598-9285) - (BIT; Admissibility of claims; Fair and equitable treatment; ICSID).
• Ioan Micula and others v Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20) (www.practicallaw.com/0-554-4685) (Fair and equitable treatment standard; umbrella clause; EU law).
• Jan de Nul NV Dredging International NV v Arab Republic of Egypt, (ICSID Case No ARB/04/13) (www.practicallaw.com/1-384-0664) - (Principles of attribution; BIT; denial of justice; fair and equitable standard).
• Joseph Charles Lemire v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/06/18) - (Breach of settlement agreement; fair and equitable standard treatment).
• Merrill & Ring Forestry LP v Canada (UNCITRAL, ICSID Administered Case (NAFTA)) - (NAFTA; fair and equitable treatment).
• Metalpar SA and Buen Aire SA v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/5) (www.practicallaw.com/8-383-2967) - (No adverse impact on investments; BIT).
• Renta 4 SVSA v Russian Federation (Arbitration V 024/2007) (www.practicallaw.com/0-385-8579) - (SCC arbitration; BIT; MFN clause; fair and equitable treatment).
• Rompetrol Group NV v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/3) (www.practicallaw.com/9-529-0306) (Criminal proceedings; fair and equitable treatment).
• Sempra v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB 02/16) (www.practicallaw.com/1-376-6273) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; umbrella clause).
• Swisslion DOO Skopje v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (ICSID Case No ARB/09/16) (www.practicallaw.com/9-520-9778) FET standard; judicial proceedings).
• Venezuela Holdings and others v. the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27) (www.practicallaw.com/5-585-2186) - (Fair and equitable treatment; expropriation; compensation).
• Vigotop Ltd v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/11/22) (www.practicallaw.com/2-590-7406) - (ICSID; Expropriation; BIT).
• Walter Bau AG (in Liquidation) v The Kingdom of Thailand (UNCITRAL, 1 July 2009) - (Fair and equitable treatment; pre-treaty conduct).

Fork-in-the-road

• Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen (ICSID Case No ARB/05/17) (www.practicallaw.com/5-380-8271) - (BIT; jurisdiction; investment certificate; fork in the road).
• Pantechniki v Albania (ICSID Case No ARB/07/21) (www.practicallaw.com/0-422-1842) - (BIT; fork in the road provision; denial of justice).

Jurisdiction

• Abaclat and others v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-507-4388) - (Jurisdiction; class actions).
• Antoine Goetz and Consorts and another v Republic v Burundi (ICSID Case No ARB/01/2) (www.practicallaw.com/7-521-7576) (Jurisdiction; counterclaim).
• Apotex Holdings Inc. and Apotex Inc. v United States of America, (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/1) (www.practicallaw.com/5-586-2048) - (NAFTA; Jurisdictional issues; Arbitral awards and challenges).
• Alasdair Ross Anderson and others v Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/07/3) - (Jurisdiction; BIT; funds; investment).
• Austrian Airlines v Slovak Republic (UNCITRAL, 20 October 2009) - (Jurisdiction; expropriation; MFN).
• Brandes Investment Partners LP v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/3) (www.practicallaw.com/8-507-2634) - (Jurisdiction; consent; Venezuelan investment legislation).
• Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) (www.practicallaw.com/7-522-1352) (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; stay; local court proceedings).
• Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) - (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; admissibility).
• Burlington Resources Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/08/5) - (Jurisdiction; non-expropriation; tax legislation).
• Burlington Resources Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB 08/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-523-4754) (Privity; jurisdiction; umbrella clause).
• Cementownia "Nowa Huta" SA v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No Arb(AF)/06/2) - (Fraudulent claim dismissed).
• Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v The Republic of Ecuador, UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/1-384-1687) - (Jurisdictional objections; BIT).
• ConocoPhillips Petrozuata and others v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/30) (www.practicallaw.com/2-562-2385) - (ICSID; Jurisdiction).
• Czech Republic v European Media Ventures SA [2007] EWHC 2851 (Comm) (www.practicallaw.com/6-379-8653) - (Jurisdiction; Interpretation of BIT).
• Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen (ICSID Case No ARB/05/17) (www.practicallaw.com/5-380-8271) - (BIT; jurisdiction; investment certificate; fork in the road).
• Duke Energy Electroquil Partners and Electroquil SA v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/19) (www.practicallaw.com/8-383-1166) - (Contract and treaty claims; cumulative jurisdiction).
• Emmis International Holding BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/1-533-2249) (Jurisdiction; bifurcation).
• Government of the Province of East Kalimantan v PT Kaltim Prima Coal, Rio Tinto PLC, BP PLC, Pacific Resources Investments Ltd, BP International Ltd, Sangatta Holdings Ltd and Kalimantan Coal Ltd (ICSID Case No ARB/07/3) (www.practicallaw.com/8-504-4617) - (Jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention).
• Grand River Enterprises et al. v United States of America, UNCITRAL (NAFTA) (www.practicallaw.com/7-504-8932) - (NAFTA; jurisdiction; foreign investment).
• Helnan International Hotels A/S v The Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/05/19) (www.practicallaw.com/0-382-7385) - (Res judicata; contractual dispute; ICSID).
• Hochtief AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31) (www.practicallaw.com/9-511-1017) - (MFN clauses; jurisdiction).
• ICS Inspection and Control Services Ltd (United Kingdom) v Argentine Republic (PCA Case No 2010-9) (www.practicallaw.com/9-518-2509) - (Jurisdiction; MFN; PCA)
• Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GMBH and others v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/08/8) (www.practicallaw.com/0-502-3770) - (Jurisdiction; investment).
• Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula and others v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/05/20) (Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility) (www.practicallaw.com/1-383-5403) - (ICSID jurisdiction; effective nationality test).
• Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v Malaysia (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10) (www.practicallaw.com/3-385-8196) - (ICSID jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention; meaning of investment).
• Malaysian Historical Salvors v The Government of Malaysia (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10) (www.practicallaw.com/2-368-0976) - (ICSID jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention; meaning of investment).
• Malicorp Ltd v The Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/08/18) (www.practicallaw.com/9-504-8356) - (Jurisdiction; investment; Article 25 ICSID Convention).
• Metal-Tech Ltd v The Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3) (www.practicallaw.com/0-552-6605) (Jurisdiction; corruption).
• Mobil Corporation and others v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/07/27) - (Jurisdiction; interpretation of national law).
• Murphy Exploration and Production Company International v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/08/4) (www.practicallaw.com/8-504-3118) - (Jurisdiction; cooling-off period).
• Mytilineos Holdings SA V (1) The State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (2) Republic of Serbia 8 September 2006 (released October 2008) (www.practicallaw.com/6-383-9088) - (Jurisdiction; definition of investment; BIT).
• OPIC Karimun Corporationv Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/14) (www.practicallaw.com/3-570-0108) - (Jurisdiction; consent; Venezuelan investment legislation).
• Paushok and others v Government of Mongolia (UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules) Award of 28 April 2011 on Jurisdiction and Liability (www.practicallaw.com/5-506-1444) - (Jurisdiction; counterclaims).
• Perenco Ecuador Ltd. v The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador) (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/6) (www.practicallaw.com/1-584-3448) - (Jurisdiction; what is an investor; control).
• Philip Morris Brand Sarl and others v Uruguay (ICSID Case No ARB/10/7) (www.practicallaw.com/2-535-4518) (Litigation requirement; precondition).
• Phoenix Action Ltd v The Czech Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/06/5) (www.practicallaw.com/7-385-6591) - (ICSID jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention; meaning of investment).
• Quiborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No ARB/06/2) (www.practicallaw.com/6-521-9142) (Jurisdiction; definition of investment).
• Railroad Development Corporation (RDC) v Republic of Guatemala (ICSID Case No ARB/07/23) - (Jurisdictional objections; CAFTA).
• Renée Rose Levy and Gremcitel S.A. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/17 (www.practicallaw.com/4-597-5545) - (ICSID; Jurisdictional challenges; Abuse of process).
• RosInvestCo UK Ltd v The Russian Federation Case Number V 079/2005 (www.practicallaw.com/7-380-5974) - (Jurisdiction; MFN clause; BIT).
• RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/05/14) (www.practicallaw.com/4-385-5852) - (Jurisdiction; breach of contract; meaning of investment; ICSID Convention).
• Roussalis v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/1) (www.practicallaw.com/9-516-2691) - (Jurisdiction; state counterclaim).
• Ruby Roz Agricol and Kaseem Omar v Kazakhstan, UNCITRAL (Award on Jurisdiction) (www.practicallaw.com/5-540-1132) - (Jurisdiction; UNCITRAL arbitration).
• Société Générale v The Dominican Republic (LCIA Case No UN 7927), UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/2-383-6812) - (Jurisdiction; BIT).
• Teinver SA and others v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/1) (www.practicallaw.com/9-523-4216) (Jurisdiction; BIT pre-conditions).
• The Rompetrol Group NV v Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/3) (www.practicallaw.com/0-381-7428) - (Jurisdiction; nationality; BIT).
• Toto Construzioni Generali SpA v Republic of Lebanon (ICSID Case No ARB/07/12) - (Meaning of investment; jurisdiction).
• Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands BV v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB/11/28) (www.practicallaw.com/0-525-6514) - (Pre-arbitration negotiation; compliance with BIT).
• Waguih Elie George Siag and Clorinda Vecchi v Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/05/150) - (Jurisdiction; BIT).

Interim measures

• British Caribbean Bank Limited v The Government of Belize [2013] CCJ 4 (AJ) (www.practicallaw.com/3-533-6430) (Anti-arbitration injunction).
• Burlington Resources Inc and others v Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador) (ICSID Case No ARB/08/5) (www.practicallaw.com/2-386-3481) - (Provisional measures; ICSID).
• Caratube International Oil Company LLP and Devincci Salah Hourani v Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No ARB/13/13 (www.practicallaw.com/1-595-5105) (Provisional measures; criminal investigations by state).
• Cemex Caracas Investments BV v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/15) - (Provisional measures; aggravation; irreparable harm test).
• Chevron and another v Republic of Ecuador (PCA Case No 2009-23) (www.practicallaw.com/8-524-1397) (Breach if interim awards).
• Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v Republic of Indonesia, ICSID Case No ARB/12/14 and 12/40 (www.practicallaw.com/1-595-5105) (Provisional measures; criminal investigations by state).
• City Oriente Limited v The Republic of Ecuador and others (ICSID Case No ARB/06/21) (www.practicallaw.com/4-382-1305) - (Provisional measures; requirement of irreparable harm).
• Commerce Group Corp and San Sebastian Gold Mines Inc v El Salvador (ICSID Case No ARB/09/17 (Annulment Proceeding)) (www.practicallaw.com/5-521-5564) (Security for costs)
• ETI Euro Telecom International NV v Republic of Bolivia and another [2008] EWCA Civ 880 (www.practicallaw.com/7-382-8602) - (Freezing injunction; jurisdiction; English Court of Appeal).
• ETI Euro Telecom International NV v Republic of Bolivia and another [2008] EWHC 1689 (Comm) (www.practicallaw.com/1-382-7078) - (Freezing injunction; jurisdiction; English High Court).
• Lao Holdings NV v The Lao People's Democratic Republic (ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/12/6) (www.practicallaw.com/7-571-3986) - (Provisional measures; application to modify; criminal investigation; ICSID).
• Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v The Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/06/11) (www.practicallaw.com/0-376-6754) - (Interim measures; specific performance).
• Perenco Ecuador Ltd v The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petroleos Del Ecuador (Petroecuador) (ICSID Case No ARB/08/6) (www.practicallaw.com/6-386-1847) - (ICSID; provisional measures).
• Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v Australia) (Order of 3 March 2014 on a Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) (www.practicallaw.com/8-560-5608) - (ICJ; Interim measures; Protection of communications).
• RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/10/6) (Application for Security of Costs) (14 October 2010) - (Provisional measures; security for costs).
• Sergei Paushok and others v Government of Mongolia (Order on Interim Measures), UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/6-383-8729) - (Interim measures; UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules).
• Tethyan Copper Company Pty Ltd v Pakistan (ICSID Case No ARB/12/1) (www.practicallaw.com/7-523-2256) (Provisional measures; state ordered to provide updates).
• TSA Spectrum de Argentina SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/05/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-384-3630) - (Jurisdiction; ICSID Convention; corporate nationality grounds).

Meaning of investment

• Alps Finance and Trade AG v Slovak Republic (Switzerland/Slovak Republic BIT) Award (redacted version), 5 March 2011 (www.practicallaw.com/6-505-8709) - (Assignment; meaning of investment).
• GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/08/16) (www.practicallaw.com/6-505-7936) - (Meaning of investment; costs).
• Quiborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No ARB/06/2) (www.practicallaw.com/6-521-9142) (Jurisdiction; definition of investment).
• Romak SA v Uzbekistan (PCA Case No AA280) - (UNCITRAL; meaning of investment).
• Toto Construzioni Generali SpA v Republic of Lebanon (ICSID Case No ARB/07/12) - (Meaning of investment; jurisdiction).

Meaning of investor

• Cementownia "Nowa Huta" SA v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No Arb(AF)/06/2) - (Fraudulent claim dismissed).
• Cemex Caracas Investments BV and Cemex Caracas II Investments BV v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/15) (www.practicallaw.com/1-504-4611) - (Indirect investors; BIT; Venezuelan Investment Law).
• HICEE BV v Slovak Republic (PCA Case No 2009-11) Partial Award (23 May 2011) (www.practicallaw.com/7-515-1957) - (Meaning of investor; PCA).

Most Favoured Nation (MFN)

• Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret VE Sanayi A.S. v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No ARB/03/29) - (Contract and treaty claims; MFN; fair and equitable treatment).
• Daimler Financial Services AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1) (Award on Jurisdiction) (www.practicallaw.com/9-521-2506) (Most favoured nation).
• Deutsche Bank AG v Sri Lanka (ICSID Case No ARB/09/02) (www.practicallaw.com/9-525-4681) (Definition of investment; Salini).
• EDF International SA and others v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/23) (www.practicallaw.com/8-520-6148) (MFN clause, umbrella clauses).
• Garanti Koza LLP v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No ARB/1120) (www.practicallaw.com/7-536-5208) (MFN; dispute resolution provisions)
• Hochtief AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31) (www.practicallaw.com/9-511-1017) - (Investment treaty; MFN clauses; jurisdiction).
• ICS Inspection and Control Services Ltd (United Kingdom) v Argentine Republic (PCA Case No 2010-9) (www.practicallaw.com/9-518-2509) - (Jurisdiction; MFN clause; PCA)
• Impregilo SpA v Argentina Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/07/17) (www.practicallaw.com/8-506-8745) - (MFN clauses; dissenting opinion).
• Kiliç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No ARB/10/01) (www.practicallaw.com/0-534-6497).
• Mr Tza Yap Shum v The Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No ARB/07/6) - (MFN clause; nationality requirements; interpretation of investment).
• Renta 4 SVSA v Russian Federation (Arbitration V 024/2007) (www.practicallaw.com/0-385-8579) - (SCC arbitration; BIT; MFN clause; fair and equitable treatment).
• RosInvestCo UK Ltd v The Russian Federation Case Number V 079/2005 (www.practicallaw.com/7-380-5974) - (Jurisdiction; MFN clause; BIT).
• Wintershall Aktiengesellschaft v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/04/14) (www.practicallaw.com/6-384-4626) - (MFN clause; BIT).

NAFTA

• Apotex Inc v United States, UNCITRAL (NAFTA) Procedural Order No 2 (www.practicallaw.com/9-516-9353) - (NAFTA; non-disputing parties submissions).
• Apotex Holdings Inc. and Apotex Inc. v United States of America, (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/1) (www.practicallaw.com/5-587-0185) - (NAFTA; Jurisdictional issues; Arbitral awards and challenges).
• Archer Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc v Mexico (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/04/05) (www.practicallaw.com/2-382-9350) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; counter-measures defence).
• Bayview Irrigation District et al v Mexico (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/05/1) (www.practicallaw.com/6-369-5971) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; foreign investments).
• Corn Products International, Inc v The United Mexican States (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/04/01) (www.practicallaw.com/6-385-6167) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; counter-measures defence).
• Grand River Enterprises et al. v United States of America, UNCITRAL (NAFTA) (www.practicallaw.com/7-504-8932) - (NAFTA; jurisdiction; foreign investment).
• Merrill & Ring Forestry LP v Canada (UNCITRAL, ICSID Administered Case (NAFTA)) - (NAFTA; fair and equitable treatment).
• St Mary’s VCNA v the Government of Canada (NAFTA/UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/5-526-7968) (Procedure; disclosure, legal privilege).
• United Parcel Service of America II v Government of Canada (11 June 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/4-369-9017) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; national treatment obligation).
• Vito G Gallo v Government of Canada (14 October 2009) - (NAFTA; Challenge to arbitrator; impartiality and independence).

Nationality requirement

• Mr Tza Yap Shum v The Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No ARB/07/6) - (MFN clause; nationality requirements; interpretation of investment).
• Saba Fakes v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB/07/20) - (Investment; nationality requirement).

Procedure

• Cambodia Power Company v Kingdom of Cambodia and another (ICSID Case No ARB/09/18) (www.practicallaw.com/9-525-7905) - (Multiple contracts; single arbitration proceeding).
• Emmis International Holding BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/1-533-2249) (Bifurcation; jurisdictional phase).
• Forminster Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/7-597-7265) - (Article 34(2), UNCITRAL Rules 1976; notice of withdrawal; arbitration not terminated).
• Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd v Czech Republic (Final award, PCA, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, 12 November 2010) (www.practicallaw.com/2-504-7459) - (BIT; public policy; enforcement).
• Giovanni Alemanni and Others v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/8 (www.practicallaw.com/8-589-9045) - (Third party funding; Multi-party).
• Guaracachi America, Inc. and Rurelec PLC v The Plurinational State of Bolivia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2011-17 (www.practicallaw.com/8-557-4386) - (Multi-party; Joinder of BITs; Denial of benefits).
• Itera International Energy LLC and Itera Group NV v Georgia (ICSID Case No Arb/08/07) - (Ancillary claims).
• LG&E v Argentina (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1) (www.practicallaw.com/7-382-8112) - (Supplementary decisions; ICSID Convention).
• Libananco Holdings Co Ltd v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB/06/9) (www.practicallaw.com/2-382-8609) - (Interception of privileged communications).
• Railroad Development Corporation v Republic of Guatemala, (ICSID Case No ARB/07/23) (www.practicallaw.com/9-383-9992) - (Preserving evidence; ICSID).

Transparency and amicus curiae

• Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No ARB/05/22) (Procedural Order No 5) (2 February 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/7-225-3964) - (Amicus curiae briefs; ICSID).
• Giovanna a Beccara and others v Argentina (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/05) - (Confidentiality; ICSID Convention).
• Piero Foresti, Laura de Carli and others v Republic of South Africa (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/07/1) - (ICSID; non-disputing parties; amicus curiae).
• Suez and others v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/19) (Order in response to a petition by five NGOs for permission to make an amicus brief) (12 February 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/7-223-1967) - (Amicus curiae briefs; NGOs; investment treaty arbitration).

Treaty interpretation

• Churchill Mining Plc v Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No ARB/12/14) (www.practicallaw.com/0-559-2285) - (Treaty interpretation; Vienna Convention).
• Hrvatska Elektroprivreda DD v The Republic of Slovenia (ICSID Case No ARB/05/24) (www.practicallaw.com/3-386-4833) - (Treaty interpretation; Vienna Convention).
• Kilic Insaat Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/1) (www.practicallaw.com/7-519-7724) - (Inconsistencies in language of BIT texts)
• Planet Mining Pty Ltd v Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No ARB/12/40) (www.practicallaw.com/0-559-2285) - (Treaty interpretation; Vienna Convention).

Umbrella clause

• Bosh International Inc and another v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/08/11) (www.practicallaw.com/6-522-2941) (Umbrella clause; breach of a contract; non-party).
• Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) (www.practicallaw.com/7-522-1352) (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; stay; local court proceedings).
• Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) - (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; admissibility).
• Burlington Resources Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB 08/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-523-4754) (Privity; jurisdiction; umbrella clause).
• EDF International SA and others v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/23) (www.practicallaw.com/8-520-6148) (MFN clause, umbrella clauses).
• Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Republic of Ghana (ICSID Case No ARB/07/24) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-5323) - (Contractual claims; BIT).
• Ioan Micula and others v Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20) (www.practicallaw.com/0-554-4685) (Fair and equitable treatment standard; umbrella clause; EU law).
• Sempra v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB 02/16) (www.practicallaw.com/1-376-6273) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; umbrella clause).
• SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance SA v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/29) (www.practicallaw.com/8-518-5344) - (Obligations under investment contract; umbrella clause).

Source: http://uk.practicallaw.com/4-518-1668?q=icsid+enforcement+problems

Arbitration Institutions in Central and Western Europe

Albanian Commercial Mediation and Arbitration Center - Tirana, Albania
Alternative Dispute Resolution Center - Rome, Italy
Alternative Dispute Resolution Chambers UK - London, England
Alternative Dispute Resolution Services (ADRS) - Newcastle, England
Amsterdam ADR Institute - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Arab Association for International Arbitration (AAIA) - Paris, France
Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Institute of the Oslo Chamber of Commerce - Oslo, Norway
Arbitration and Mediation Centre of Paris (CMAP) - Paris, France
Arbitration and Mediation Tribunal of the Balearic Islands (TAMIB) - Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Arbitration Centre of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Geneva - Geneva, Switzerland
Arbitration Court at the Economic Chamber of the Czech Republic - Prague, Czech Republic
Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce (HK) - Hamburg, Germany
Arbitration Court of the Estonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACECCI) - Tallinn, Estonia
Arbitration Court of the Slovak Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Bratislava, Slovakia
Arbitration Institute of the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland - Helsinki, Finland
Arbitration Court of the Latvian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (LCCI) - Riga, Latvia
Arbitration Service of the Cyprus Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Nicosia, Cyprus
Association for International Arbitration (AIA) - Brussels, Belgium
Association Française d’Arbitrage (AFA) – Paris, France
Belgian Centre for Arbitration and Mediation (CEPANI-CEPINA) - Brussels, Belgium
Board of Arbitration of the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland - Helsinki, Finland
Center for Arbitration and Mediation (CVM) - Munich, Germany
Centre Européen d’Arbitrage (European Centre of Arbitration)(CEA) - Strasbourg, France
Centre for Commercial Arbitration of the Portuguese Chamber of Commerce and Industry - London, England
Centre for International Mediation and Arbitration (CIMA) - Paris, France
Chamber of National and International Arbitration Milan (Camera Arbitrale Milano)(CAM) - Milan, Italy
Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) - London, England
Chinese European Arbitration Centre (CEAC) - Hamburg, Germany
City Disputes Panel (CDP) - London, England
Commercial Arbitration Court – Iceland Chamber of Commerce - Reykjavík, Iceland
Court of Arbitration at the Zurich Chamber of Commerce - Zurich, Switzerland
Court of Arbitration Attached to the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Budapest, Hungary
Court of Arbitration of the Polish Chamber of Commerce (Sąd Arbitrażowyprzy KrajowejIzbie Gospodarczej)(SAKIG) - Warsaw, Poland
Court of Arbitration for Sport - Lausanne, Switzerland
Court of International Commercial Arbitration Attached to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania (CICA) - Bucharest Romania
Danish Centre for Conflict Resolution - Copenhagen, Denmark
Danish Institute of Arbitration - Copenhagen, Denmark
Dublin International Arbitration Centre - Dublin, Ireland
Energy Arbitration Court (EAVB) - Budapest, Hungary
Eurochambres – Association of European Chambers of Commerce and Industry - Brussels, Belgium
European Centre for Financial Dispute Resolution (EUROARBITRATION) - Paris, France
Foreign Trade Court of Arbitration at the Serbian Chamber of Commerce - Belgrade, Serbia
Frankfurt International Arbitration Centre (FIAC) - Frankfurt, Germany
Galician Association of Arbitration and Mediation (ASGAME) - Coruña, Spain
German Institution of Arbitration (DIS) - Köln, Munich, Berlin, Germany
Greek Chamber of Commerce (ACCI) - Athens, Greece
Hellenic Mediation and Arbitration Centre - Athens, Greece
Institute for the Study and Promotion of International Commercial Law and Arbitration (ISDACI) - Milan, Italy
Insurance and Reinsurance Arbitration Society (ARIAS) - London, England
International Arbitration – Venice Chamber of National and International Arbitration - Venice, Italy
International Arbitration Chamber of Paris - Paris, France
International Arbitration Institute (IAI) - Paris, France
Italian Association for Arbitration - Rome, Italy
Law Society of Ireland Arbitration Committee - Dublin, Ireland
Malta Arbitration Centre - Valletta, Malta
Maritime Arbitral Chamber of Paris - Paris, France
Muslim Arbitration Tribunal (MAT) - London, England
National Institute for Conciliation and Arbitration (NIPA) - Sofia, Bulgaria
Netherlands Arbitration Institute (NAI) - Rotterdam, Netherlands
Permanent Arbitration Court at the Croatian Chamber of Commerce - Zagreb, Croatia
Permanent Court of Arbitration Attached to the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Slovenia - Ljubljana, Slovenia
Riga International Arbitration Court - Riga, Latvia
Scottish Arbitration Centre (SAC) - Edinburgh, Scotland
Spanish Court of Arbitration - Madrid, Spain
Spanish Society of Arbitration (SEA) - Madrid, Spain
Stockholm Arbitration and Litigation Center (SALC) - Stockholm, Sweden
Tribunal Arbitrajo del ICAV (TAV) - Valencia, Spain
Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC) - Vienna, Austria
Vilnius Court of Commercial Arbitration (VCCA) - Vilnius, Lithuania
World Intellectual Property Organisation Arbitration and Mediation Centre (WIPO) - Geneva, Switzerland



Source: http://www.ezcarbitrationlawfirm.com/arbitral-institutions.html

Arbitration Institutions in Eastern Europe

Azerbaijan Arbitration and Mediation Centre - Baku, Azerbaijan
International Arbitration Court of the Belarusian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Minsk, Belarus
International Arbitration Court of the Juridical Centre (IUS) - Almaty, Kazakhstan
International Commercial Arbitration Court (ICAC) at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation - Moscow, Russia
International Commercial Arbitration Court at the RF Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Moscow, Russia
International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Kiev, Ukraine
International Commercial Arbitration Court of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Moldova - Chisinau, Moldova
International Court of Arbitration in Affiliation with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Kyrgyz Republic - Kyrgyz Republic
Maritime Arbitration Commission at the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry - Kiev, Ukraine
Permanent Court of Arbitration Dispute Resolution Centre (DRC) - Tbilisi, Georgia
Permanently Acting Arbitration Court at Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Armenia (ACCCIRA) - Yerevan, Armenia
Public Organization for the Development of Third Party Arbitration and Legal Support Centres (ARBITRAZH) - Dushanbe, Tajikistan
St. Petersburg International Arbitration Court (SPICAC) - St. Petersburg, Russia
Tbilisi Arbitration Chamber (TAC) - Tbilisi, Georgia


source: http://www.ezcarbitrationlawfirm.com/arbitral-institutions.html

Arbitration under UNCITRAL and under institutional rules: principal differences

• UNCITRAL Rules do not specify the possibility of consolidation
• UNCITRAL Rules do not specify the possibility of expedited proceedings
• UNCITRAL Rules do not provide for the  emergency arbitrator
• UNCITRAL Rules do not do not provide the Terms of Reference
• UNCITRAL Rules do not specify time to make award
• Unlike other institutions, no mandatory appointing authority and the parties may choose. In default – PCA designates
• In UNCITRAL arbitration the procedure is defined by tribunal, while some institutional rules allow the parties to define the procedures
• In UNCITRAL arbitration the number of arbitrators is three, unless parties agree otherwise (in most institutional rules – one, unless case warrants three)
• Unless agreed by the parties, in UNCITRAL arbitration the tribunal decides on the seat of arbitration (under the most institutional rules  – the institution will decide)
• In principle, the costs of the arbitration under the UNCITRAL Rules are to be borne by the unsuccessful party but are subject to the tribunal’s discretion. Under the Most institutional rules the – the tribunal apportions.
• Although the fees in institutional arbitrations are often more expensive than in UNCITRAL arbitrations, the latter are generally less predictable.