Subject area
Annulment, correction and revision of awards
- Alapli Elektrik B.V. v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/13) (www.practicallaw.com/8-576-9925) - (ICSID; annulment)
- AWG Group v Argentina (UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
- Azurix Corp v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12) (Annulment proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/9-500-1617) - (Annulment proceedings; ICSID; shareholder).
- Azurix Corp. v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12) (www.practicallaw.com/5-380-2896) - (Request for annulment; stay of enforcement; security).
- CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/8) (www.practicallaw.com/9-376-5236) - (Partial annulment; ICSID award).
- Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/97/3) (Annulment Proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/8-384-1491) - (Stay of enforcement; ICSID annulment proceedings).
- Continental Casualty Company v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/9) - (Annulment; stay of enforcement).
- Daimler Financial Services AG v Republic of Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1 (www.practicallaw.com/9-595-8925) - (Annulment; Jurisdiction; ICSID; MFN).
- Enron Creditors Recovery Corp, Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/3) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0293) - (Annulment; defence of necessity).
- Enron Corporation Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case Number ARB /01/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-383-6107) - (Annulment; stay of enforcement; security).
- Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v The Philippines (ICSID Case No ARB/03/25) (www.practicallaw.com/1-504-9581) - (Annulment; right to be heard).
- Gold Reserve Inc. v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/09/1 (www.practicallaw.com/0-594-4725) - (Corrections to award; Article 56(1); ICSID)
- Helnan International Hotels A/S v Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/05/19) (Annulment proceeding) - (Annulment; exhaustion of local remedies).
- Impregilo SpA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/07/17) (Annulment Proceeding (www.practicallaw.com/2-556-5785)) - (ICSID; application for annulment, MFN).
- Industria Nacional de Alimentos SA v Peru (ICSID Case no ARB 03/4) (www.practicallaw.com/5-376-3673) - (Application for annulment; treaty interpretation; manifest excess of powers).
- Kardassopoulos and Fuchs v Georgia (ICSID Case Nos ARB/05/18 and ARB/07/15) (www.practicallaw.com/9-504-0906) - (Stay of enforcement; pending annulment proceedings).
- MCI Power Group LC and New Turbine Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/03/6) (Annulment Proceeding) - (Annulment refused; manifest excess of power; failure to state reasons).
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/06/11) (Stay of enforcement; continuation, annulment).
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11) (www.practicallaw.com/2-583-0247) - (Enforcement; pending annulment; stay).
- Republic of Kazakhstan v Rumeli Telekom AS and Telsim Mobil Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri AS (ICSID Case No ARB/05/16) - (Annulment proceedings; Article 52 ICSID Convention).
- RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/05/14 (Annulment proceeding)) - (ICSID; annulment; jurisdiction; attempt to reopen evidence).
- Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/02/16) (Annulment proceeding) - (ICSID; annulment; manifest excess of powers).
- Sempra Energy International v Argentine Republic (ARB/02/16) (www.practicallaw.com/6-383-8786) - (Stay of enforcement lifted; ICSID).
- Sempra Energy International v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/12/16) (www.practicallaw.com/1-385-2930) - (Conditional stay of enforcement).
- Suez, Societad General de Aguas de Barcelona SA and InterAgua Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/03/17) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
- RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case ARB/05/14) (Annulment Proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/9-506-1084) - (Order for costs; discontinuance; annulment proceedings).
- Victor Pey Casado and President Allende Foundation v Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No ARB/98/2) (www.practicallaw.com/0-541-7866) (Request for supplementary decision; annulment).
- Victor Pey Casado and Foundation "Presidente Allende" v Republic of Chile (ICSID Case No. ARB/98/2) (www.practicallaw.com/8-523-5829) (Partial annulment; departure from a fundamental rule of procedure).
CAFTA
- Railroad Development Corp v Guatemala (ICSID Case No ARB/07/23) (Decision on Objection to Jurisdiction, CAFTA Article 10.20.5) (www.practicallaw.com/3-384-1078) - (CAFTA; scope of waiver).
- Pac Rim Cayman LLC v Republic of El Salvador (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/12) (www.practicallaw.com/1-519-8260) (CAFTA; jurisdiction; denial of benefits).
- Pac Rim Cayman LLC v The Republic of El Salvador (ICSID Case No ARB/09/12). Decision on the Respondent's Preliminary Objections under CAFTA Articles 10.20.4 and 10.20.5) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0306) - (CAFTA; Preliminary objections).
- Railroad Development Corporation v Republic of Guatemala (Award, 29 June 2012) (www.practicallaw.com/9-520-3234)(DR-CAFTA; minimum standard of treatment).
Challenges to arbitrators, counsel and experts
- Abaclat and others (Case formerly known as Beccara and others) v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/2-519-1215) - (ICSID Convention; disqualification of arbitrator).
- Abaclat and others (Case formerly known as Beccara and others) v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/1-557-2946) - (Arbitrator challenge, ICSID Convention, Application for disqualification).
- Alpha Projektholding GmbH v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/07/16) - (Arbitrator challenge; Article 57 ICSID Convention).
- Blue Bank International & Trust (Barbados) Ltd v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/20) (www.practicallaw.com/5-551-3686)(Arbitrator challenge; Disqualification).
- Caratube International Oil Company LLP and another v Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No ARB/113/13) (www.practicallaw.com/1-563-5128) - (Disqualification of arbitrator; ICSID).
Cemex Caracas Investments BV and another v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/15) - (Arbitrator challenge; time limit). - Cia de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/97/3) (Annulment Proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/8-503-0601) - (ICSID; duties of arbitrators; conflicts of interest).
- ConocoPhillips Company et al v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case no ARB/07/30) (www.practicallaw.com/6-518-4171) (Arbitrator challenge; merger of law firm).
- ConocoPhillips Company et al v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case no ARB/07/30) (www.practicallaw.com/4-567-9446) (Arbitrator challenge; Impartiality; ICSID).
- ED & F International SA and ors v Argentina, (ICSID Case No ARB/03/23) (www.practicallaw.com/1-383-9991) - (Challenge to arbitrator; arbitrator independence; impartiality).
- Flughafen Zürich AG and Gestión e Ingenería IDC SA v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/19) (www.practicallaw.com/0-521-5547) (Application to disqualify expert).
- Hrvatsa Elektroprivreda, dd v Republic of Slovenia (ICSID Case No ARB/05/24) (www.practicallaw.com/9-384-3116) - (Barrister excluded; arbitrator; same set of Chambers).
- İçkale İnşaat Limited Şirketi v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/24) (www.practicallaw.com/5-576-1266) - (ICSID; disqualification; arbitrators and appointments).
- OPIC Karimum Corporation v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/14) (www.practicallaw.com/3-506-4207) - (Arbitrator challenges; multiple appointments).
- Participaciones Inversiones Portuarias SARL v Gabonese Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/08/17) - (Arbitrator challenge; impartiality).
- Perenco Ecuador Limited v The Republic of Ecuador & Empresa Estatal Petroleos del Ecuador (PCA Case No IR-2009/1) - (Arbitrator challenge; impartiality and independence).
- Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Europe v The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/12/13) (www.practicallaw.com/0-525-1229) (Challenge to arbitrator; independence and impartiality).
- Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Interagua Servicios Integrales de Aqua S.A. v Argentine Republic (Case No ARB/03/17) Decision on the Proposal for the Disqualification (www.practicallaw.com/1-379-8325) - (Challenge to arbitrator; arbitrator independence/impartiality; ICSID).
- Suez and others v Argentina (Case Nos ARB/03/19 and ARB/03/17) (www.practicallaw.com/0-382-1859) - (Challenge to arbitrator; independence; impartiality; ICSID).
- Tidewater Inc and others v Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/5) (www.practicallaw.com/2-504-9156) - (ICSID; arbitrator challenge; multiple appointments).
- The Rompetrol Group NV v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/3) - (Challenge to legal representatives; no power to remove counsel).
- Universal Compression International Holdings SLU v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/9) (www.practicallaw.com/6-506-3843) - (Arbitrator challenge; multiple appointments).
- Urbaser SA and another v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/27) (Decision on Claimants' Proposal to Disqualify) (www.practicallaw.com/2-503-0623) - (Challenge to arbitrator; published articles; awards).
- Vito G Gallo v Government of Canada (14 October 2009) - (NAFTA; Challenge to arbitrator; impartiality and independence).
Claims manifestly without legal merit
- Brandes Investment Partners, LP v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/3) - (Jurisdiction; Rule 41(5); manifestly without legal merit).
- Cementownia "Nowa Huta" SA v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No Arb(AF)/06/2) - (Fraudulent claim dismissed).
- Emmis International Holding, BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/9-525-6915) - (Manifestly without legal merit; Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules).
- Global Trading Resource Corp and Globex International Inc v Ukraine (ICSID Case ARB/09/11) (www.practicallaw.com/2-504-1645) - (Rule 41(5) ICSID Arbitration Rules; claims manifestly without legal merit).
- MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas Company Plc v Republic of Croatia (ICSID Case No ARB/13/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-592-7586) (Claims manifestly without legal merit; ICSID; Rule 41(5)).
- PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd. v Independent State of Papua New Guinea, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/33 (www.practicallaw.com/8-588-8872) - (ICSID; Rule 41.5 ICSID Arbitration Rules; claims manifestly without legal merit).
- RSM Production Corporation and others v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/10/6) (Award) (10 December 2010) (www.practicallaw.com/1-504-2462) - (Rule 41.5 ICSID Arbitration Rules; claims were manifestly without legal merit).
- Trans-global Petroleum Inc v Jordan (ICSID Case no ARB/07/25) (www.practicallaw.com/0-382-5678) - (Rule 41(5) ICSID Arbitration Rules; manifestly without legal merit).
Class actions
- Abaclat and others v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-507-4388) - (Jurisdiction; class actions).
- Ambiente Ufficio SpA and others (formerly known as Giordano Alpi and others) v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/08/09) (www.practicallaw.com/5-524-1407) (Jurisdiction; multi-party; class; collective).
Costs
- ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (ICSID Case No ARB/08/2) (Annulment proceeding) (www.practicallaw.com/5-506-9044) - (Order for costs; discontinued annulment proceedings).
- David Minnotte & Robert Lewis v Republic of Poland, (ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/10/1) (www.practicallaw.com/9-586-9825) - (ICSID; BIT; Interpretation; Costs award).
- Piero Foresti and others v Republic of South Africa (ICSID Case No ARB (AF) /07/1) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0071) - (Costs; discontinuance of ICSID proceedings).
- Quadrant Pacific Growth Fund LP and Canasco Holdings Inc v Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/08/1) - (Costs decision; procedural order).
- RSM Production Corporation v Saint Lucia (ICSID Case No. ARB/12/10) (www.practicallaw.com/8-579-3586) (Security for costs).
Damages
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation and another v Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/06/11) (www.practicallaw.com/8-521-8679) (Damages; farmout agreement).
Defence of necessity
- AWG Group v Argentina (UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
- Continental Casualty Company v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/09) (www.practicallaw.com/5-383-2619) - (Necessity defence; BIT).
- Enron Corporation, Ponderosa Assets L.P. v Argentine Republic (Award) (22 May 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/2-366-1973) - (Defence of necessity; BIT).
- Enron Creditors Recovery Corp, Ponderosa Assets, LP v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/01/3) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-0293) - (Annulment; defence of necessity).
- National Grid plc v Argentine Republic (Final Award) (3 November 2008) (www.practicallaw.com/3-385-1374) - (Necessity defence; ILC Articles on State Responsibility; UNCITRAL).
- Suez, Societad General de Aguas de Barcelona SA and InterAgua Servicios Integrales del Agua SA v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/03/17) (www.practicallaw.com/0-503-0247) - (Annulment proceedings; defence of necessity).
Effective means of asserting claim
- Chevron Corporation (USA) and Texaco Petroleum Company (USA) v The Republic of Ecuador (UNCITRAL arbitration) (Partial Award on the Merits) (30 March 2010) - (Breach of BIT; effective means of asserting claim).
- White Industries Australia Ltd v Republic of India (UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/4-518-2521) - (Delays; effective means of asserting claims and enforcing rights)
Energy Charter Treaty
- AES Summit Generation Ltd and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft v Republic of Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/07/22) (www.practicallaw.com/8-503-5364) - (Energy Charter Treaty; EU law).
- Europe Cement Investment & Trade S.A. v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/07/2) (www.practicallaw.com/3-422-4132) - (Energy Charter Treaty (ECT); fraudulent claim).
- Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 226) - (Energy Charter Treaty; provisional application).
- Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 226) (www.practicallaw.com/0-576-3965) - (UNCITRAL; arbitral awards; Energy Charter Treaty).
- Plama Consortium Limited v Republic of Bulgaria (ICSID Case No ARB/03/24) (www.practicallaw.com/9-384-9825) - (Energy Charter Treaty; fraudulent misrepresentation).
- Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 228) - (Energy Charter Treaty; provisional application).
- Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 228) (www.practicallaw.com/0-576-3965) - (UNCITRAL; arbitral awards; Energy Charter Treaty).
- Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 227) - (Energy Charter Treaty; provisional application).
- Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v The Russian Federation (PCA Case No AA 227) (www.practicallaw.com/0-576-3965) - (UNCITRAL; arbitral awards; Energy Charter Treaty).
EU issues
- AES Summit Generation Ltd and AES-Tisza Erömü Kft v Republic of Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/07/22) (www.practicallaw.com/8-503-5364) - (Energy Charter Treaty; EU law).
- Eastern Sugar BV (Netherlands) v The Czech Republic (UNCITRAL ad hoc arbitration SCC No 088/2004) (www.practicallaw.com/9-378-9464) - (EU accession; BIT).
- European Commission v Republic of Slovakia [2011] EUECJ (Case C-264/09) (www.practicallaw.com/5-505-3670) - (EC Treaty; investment contract).
Expropriation
- Achmea BV v The Slovak Republic (PCA Case No. 2013-12) (www.practicallaw.com/5-571-6207) - (BIT; expropriation; fair and equitable treatment).
- Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter and others v. Republic of Zimbabwe (ICSID Case No ARB/05/6) (www.practicallaw.com/2-385-8615) - (BIT; expropriation; measure of damages).
- Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Limited v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No ARB/05/22) (www.practicallaw.com/1-382-9553) - (Expropriation; breach of BIT; damages).
- Compania de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no ARB/97/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-376-3139) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation).
- Emmis International Holding, BV v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/7-566-3731) - (Expropriation; BIT; Jurisdiction; Contractual right).
- Glamis Gold Ltd v USA (UNCITRAL) (NAFTA) (www.practicallaw.com/6-386-6816) - (NAFTA; expropriation; breach of the fair and equitable treatment standard).
- RosInvestCo UK Ltd v Russian Federation (SCC arbitration V (079/2005) (www.practicallaw.com/6-504-4411) - (Expropriation; BIT).
- Saipem SpA v The People's Republic of Bangladesh (ICSID Case No ARB/05/7) (www.practicallaw.com/9-386-3562) - (Court intervention; expropriation).
- Venezuela Holdings and others v. the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27) (www.practicallaw.com/5-585-2186) - (Fair and equitable treatment; expropriation; compensation).
Fair and equitable treatment
- Arif v Republic of Moldova (ICSID Case No ARB/11/23) (www.practicallaw.com/2-525-7447) - (Breach of fair and equitable treatment standard; Restitution and compensation).
- ATA Construction, Industrial and Trading Company v Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (ICSID Case No ARB/08/2) - (Inadmissible claim; ratione temporis; fair and equitable treatment; legitimate expectations).
- Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret VE Sanayi A.S. v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No ARB/03/29) - (Contract and treaty claims; MFN; fair and equitable treatment).
- Compania de Aguas del Aconquija SA and Vivendi Universal SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case no ARB/97/3) (www.practicallaw.com/7-376-3139) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; expropriation).
- Hochtief AG v the Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31) (www.practicallaw.com/1-598-9285) - (BIT; Admissibility of claims; Fair and equitable treatment; ICSID).
- Ioan Micula and others v Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20) (www.practicallaw.com/0-554-4685) (Fair and equitable treatment standard; umbrella clause; EU law).
- Jan de Nul NV Dredging International NV v Arab Republic of Egypt, (ICSID Case No ARB/04/13) (www.practicallaw.com/1-384-0664) - (Principles of attribution; BIT; denial of justice; fair and equitable standard).
- Joseph Charles Lemire v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/06/18) - (Breach of settlement agreement; fair and equitable standard treatment).
- Merrill & Ring Forestry LP v Canada (UNCITRAL, ICSID Administered Case (NAFTA)) - (NAFTA; fair and equitable treatment).
- Metalpar SA and Buen Aire SA v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/5) (www.practicallaw.com/8-383-2967) - (No adverse impact on investments; BIT).
- Renta 4 SVSA v Russian Federation (Arbitration V 024/2007) (www.practicallaw.com/0-385-8579) - (SCC arbitration; BIT; MFN clause; fair and equitable treatment).
- Rompetrol Group NV v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/3) (www.practicallaw.com/9-529-0306) (Criminal proceedings; fair and equitable treatment).
- Sempra v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB 02/16) (www.practicallaw.com/1-376-6273) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; umbrella clause).
- Swisslion DOO Skopje v Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (ICSID Case No ARB/09/16) (www.practicallaw.com/9-520-9778) FET standard; judicial proceedings).
- Venezuela Holdings and others v. the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/27) (www.practicallaw.com/5-585-2186) - (Fair and equitable treatment; expropriation; compensation).
- Vigotop Ltd v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/11/22) (www.practicallaw.com/2-590-7406) - (ICSID; Expropriation; BIT).
- Walter Bau AG (in Liquidation) v The Kingdom of Thailand (UNCITRAL, 1 July 2009) - (Fair and equitable treatment; pre-treaty conduct).
Fork-in-the-road
- Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen (ICSID Case No ARB/05/17) (www.practicallaw.com/5-380-8271) - (BIT; jurisdiction; investment certificate; fork in the road).
- Pantechniki v Albania (ICSID Case No ARB/07/21) (www.practicallaw.com/0-422-1842) - (BIT; fork in the road provision; denial of justice).
Jurisdiction
- Abaclat and others v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB/07/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-507-4388) - (Jurisdiction; class actions).
- Antoine Goetz and Consorts and another v Republic v Burundi (ICSID Case No ARB/01/2) (www.practicallaw.com/7-521-7576) (Jurisdiction; counterclaim).
- Apotex Holdings Inc. and Apotex Inc. v United States of America, (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/1) (www.practicallaw.com/5-586-2048) - (NAFTA; Jurisdictional issues; Arbitral awards and challenges).
- Alasdair Ross Anderson and others v Republic of Costa Rica (ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/07/3) - (Jurisdiction; BIT; funds; investment).
- Austrian Airlines v Slovak Republic (UNCITRAL, 20 October 2009) - (Jurisdiction; expropriation; MFN).
- Brandes Investment Partners LP v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/3) (www.practicallaw.com/8-507-2634) - (Jurisdiction; consent; Venezuelan investment legislation).
- Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) (www.practicallaw.com/7-522-1352) (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; stay; local court proceedings).
- Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) - (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; admissibility).
- Burlington Resources Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/08/5) - (Jurisdiction; non-expropriation; tax legislation).
- Burlington Resources Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB 08/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-523-4754) (Privity; jurisdiction; umbrella clause).
- Cementownia "Nowa Huta" SA v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No Arb(AF)/06/2) - (Fraudulent claim dismissed).
- Chevron Corporation and Texaco Petroleum Corporation v The Republic of Ecuador, UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/1-384-1687) - (Jurisdictional objections; BIT).
- ConocoPhillips Petrozuata and others v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/30) (www.practicallaw.com/2-562-2385) - (ICSID; Jurisdiction).
- Czech Republic v European Media Ventures SA [2007] EWHC 2851 (Comm) (www.practicallaw.com/6-379-8653) - (Jurisdiction; Interpretation of BIT).
- Desert Line Projects LLC v The Republic of Yemen (ICSID Case No ARB/05/17) (www.practicallaw.com/5-380-8271) - (BIT; jurisdiction; investment certificate; fork in the road).
- Duke Energy Electroquil Partners and Electroquil SA v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No. ARB/04/19) (www.practicallaw.com/8-383-1166) - (Contract and treaty claims; cumulative jurisdiction).
- Emmis International Holding BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/1-533-2249) (Jurisdiction; bifurcation).
- Government of the Province of East Kalimantan v PT Kaltim Prima Coal, Rio Tinto PLC, BP PLC, Pacific Resources Investments Ltd, BP International Ltd, Sangatta Holdings Ltd and Kalimantan Coal Ltd (ICSID Case No ARB/07/3) (www.practicallaw.com/8-504-4617) - (Jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention).
- Grand River Enterprises et al. v United States of America, UNCITRAL (NAFTA) (www.practicallaw.com/7-504-8932) - (NAFTA; jurisdiction; foreign investment).
- Helnan International Hotels A/S v The Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/05/19) (www.practicallaw.com/0-382-7385) - (Res judicata; contractual dispute; ICSID).
- Hochtief AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31) (www.practicallaw.com/9-511-1017) - (MFN clauses; jurisdiction).
- ICS Inspection and Control Services Ltd (United Kingdom) v Argentine Republic (PCA Case No 2010-9) (www.practicallaw.com/9-518-2509) - (Jurisdiction; MFN; PCA)
- Inmaris Perestroika Sailing Maritime Services GMBH and others v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/08/8) (www.practicallaw.com/0-502-3770) - (Jurisdiction; investment).
- Ioan Micula, Viorel Micula and others v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/05/20) (Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility) (www.practicallaw.com/1-383-5403) - (ICSID jurisdiction; effective nationality test).
- Malaysian Historical Salvors SDN BHD v Malaysia (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10) (www.practicallaw.com/3-385-8196) - (ICSID jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention; meaning of investment).
- Malaysian Historical Salvors v The Government of Malaysia (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10) (www.practicallaw.com/2-368-0976) - (ICSID jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention; meaning of investment).
- Malicorp Ltd v The Arab Republic of Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/08/18) (www.practicallaw.com/9-504-8356) - (Jurisdiction; investment; Article 25 ICSID Convention).
- Metal-Tech Ltd v The Republic of Uzbekistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/3) (www.practicallaw.com/0-552-6605) (Jurisdiction; corruption).
- Mobil Corporation and others v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/07/27) - (Jurisdiction; interpretation of national law).
- Murphy Exploration and Production Company International v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/08/4) (www.practicallaw.com/8-504-3118) - (Jurisdiction; cooling-off period).
- Mytilineos Holdings SA V (1) The State Union of Serbia and Montenegro (2) Republic of Serbia 8 September 2006 (released October 2008) (www.practicallaw.com/6-383-9088) - (Jurisdiction; definition of investment; BIT).
- OPIC Karimun Corporationv Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/10/14) (www.practicallaw.com/3-570-0108) - (Jurisdiction; consent; Venezuelan investment legislation).
- Paushok and others v Government of Mongolia (UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules) Award of 28 April 2011 on Jurisdiction and Liability (www.practicallaw.com/5-506-1444) - (Jurisdiction; counterclaims).
- Perenco Ecuador Ltd. v The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador) (ICSID Case No. ARB/08/6) (www.practicallaw.com/1-584-3448) - (Jurisdiction; what is an investor; control).
- Philip Morris Brand Sarl and others v Uruguay (ICSID Case No ARB/10/7) (www.practicallaw.com/2-535-4518) (Litigation requirement; precondition).
- Phoenix Action Ltd v The Czech Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/06/5) (www.practicallaw.com/7-385-6591) - (ICSID jurisdiction; Article 25 ICSID Convention; meaning of investment).
- Quiborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No ARB/06/2) (www.practicallaw.com/6-521-9142) (Jurisdiction; definition of investment).
- Railroad Development Corporation (RDC) v Republic of Guatemala (ICSID Case No ARB/07/23) - (Jurisdictional objections; CAFTA).
- Renée Rose Levy and Gremcitel S.A. v. Republic of Peru, ICSID Case No. ARB/11/17 (www.practicallaw.com/4-597-5545) - (ICSID; Jurisdictional challenges; Abuse of process).
- RosInvestCo UK Ltd v The Russian Federation Case Number V 079/2005 (www.practicallaw.com/7-380-5974) - (Jurisdiction; MFN clause; BIT).
- RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/05/14) (www.practicallaw.com/4-385-5852) - (Jurisdiction; breach of contract; meaning of investment; ICSID Convention).
- Roussalis v Romania (ICSID Case No ARB/06/1) (www.practicallaw.com/9-516-2691) - (Jurisdiction; state counterclaim).
- Ruby Roz Agricol and Kaseem Omar v Kazakhstan, UNCITRAL (Award on Jurisdiction) (www.practicallaw.com/5-540-1132) - (Jurisdiction; UNCITRAL arbitration).
- Société Générale v The Dominican Republic (LCIA Case No UN 7927), UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/2-383-6812) - (Jurisdiction; BIT).
- Teinver SA and others v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/09/1) (www.practicallaw.com/9-523-4216) (Jurisdiction; BIT pre-conditions).
- The Rompetrol Group NV v Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/06/3) (www.practicallaw.com/0-381-7428) - (Jurisdiction; nationality; BIT).
- Toto Construzioni Generali SpA v Republic of Lebanon (ICSID Case No ARB/07/12) - (Meaning of investment; jurisdiction).
- Tulip Real Estate Investment and Development Netherlands BV v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB/11/28) (www.practicallaw.com/0-525-6514) - (Pre-arbitration negotiation; compliance with BIT).
- Waguih Elie George Siag and Clorinda Vecchi v Egypt (ICSID Case No ARB/05/150) - (Jurisdiction; BIT).
Interim measures
- British Caribbean Bank Limited v The Government of Belize [2013] CCJ 4 (AJ) (www.practicallaw.com/3-533-6430) (Anti-arbitration injunction).
- Burlington Resources Inc and others v Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petróleos del Ecuador (Petroecuador) (ICSID Case No ARB/08/5) (www.practicallaw.com/2-386-3481) - (Provisional measures; ICSID).
- Caratube International Oil Company LLP and Devincci Salah Hourani v Republic of Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No ARB/13/13 (www.practicallaw.com/1-595-5105) (Provisional measures; criminal investigations by state).
- Cemex Caracas Investments BV v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/15) - (Provisional measures; aggravation; irreparable harm test).
- Chevron and another v Republic of Ecuador (PCA Case No 2009-23) (www.practicallaw.com/8-524-1397) (Breach if interim awards).
- Churchill Mining PLC and Planet Mining Pty Ltd v Republic of Indonesia, ICSID Case No ARB/12/14 and 12/40 (www.practicallaw.com/1-595-5105) (Provisional measures; criminal investigations by state).
- City Oriente Limited v The Republic of Ecuador and others (ICSID Case No ARB/06/21) (www.practicallaw.com/4-382-1305) - (Provisional measures; requirement of irreparable harm).
- Commerce Group Corp and San Sebastian Gold Mines Inc v El Salvador (ICSID Case No ARB/09/17 (Annulment Proceeding)) (www.practicallaw.com/5-521-5564) (Security for costs)
- ETI Euro Telecom International NV v Republic of Bolivia and another [2008] EWCA Civ 880 (www.practicallaw.com/7-382-8602) - (Freezing injunction; jurisdiction; English Court of Appeal).
- ETI Euro Telecom International NV v Republic of Bolivia and another [2008] EWHC 1689 (Comm) (www.practicallaw.com/1-382-7078) - (Freezing injunction; jurisdiction; English High Court).
- Lao Holdings NV v The Lao People's Democratic Republic (ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/12/6) (www.practicallaw.com/7-571-3986) - (Provisional measures; application to modify; criminal investigation; ICSID).
- Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v The Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB/06/11) (www.practicallaw.com/0-376-6754) - (Interim measures; specific performance).
- Perenco Ecuador Ltd v The Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petroleos Del Ecuador (Petroecuador) (ICSID Case No ARB/08/6) (www.practicallaw.com/6-386-1847) - (ICSID; provisional measures).
- Questions relating to the Seizure and Detention of Certain Documents and Data (Timor-Leste v Australia) (Order of 3 March 2014 on a Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) (www.practicallaw.com/8-560-5608) - (ICJ; Interim measures; Protection of communications).
- RSM Production Corporation v Grenada (ICSID Case No ARB/10/6) (Application for Security of Costs) (14 October 2010) - (Provisional measures; security for costs).
- Sergei Paushok and others v Government of Mongolia (Order on Interim Measures), UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/6-383-8729) - (Interim measures; UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules).
- Tethyan Copper Company Pty Ltd v Pakistan (ICSID Case No ARB/12/1) (www.practicallaw.com/7-523-2256) (Provisional measures; state ordered to provide updates).
- TSA Spectrum de Argentina SA v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/05/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-384-3630) - (Jurisdiction; ICSID Convention; corporate nationality grounds).
Meaning of investment
- Alps Finance and Trade AG v Slovak Republic (Switzerland/Slovak Republic BIT) Award (redacted version), 5 March 2011 (www.practicallaw.com/6-505-8709) - (Assignment; meaning of investment).
- GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/08/16) (www.practicallaw.com/6-505-7936) - (Meaning of investment; costs).
- Quiborax SA, Non Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (ICSID Case No ARB/06/2) (www.practicallaw.com/6-521-9142) (Jurisdiction; definition of investment).
- Romak SA v Uzbekistan (PCA Case No AA280) - (UNCITRAL; meaning of investment).
- Toto Construzioni Generali SpA v Republic of Lebanon (ICSID Case No ARB/07/12) - (Meaning of investment; jurisdiction).
Meaning of investor
- Cementownia "Nowa Huta" SA v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No Arb(AF)/06/2) - (Fraudulent claim dismissed).
- Cemex Caracas Investments BV and Cemex Caracas II Investments BV v Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No ARB/08/15) (www.practicallaw.com/1-504-4611) - (Indirect investors; BIT; Venezuelan Investment Law).
- HICEE BV v Slovak Republic (PCA Case No 2009-11) Partial Award (23 May 2011) (www.practicallaw.com/7-515-1957) - (Meaning of investor; PCA).
Most Favoured Nation (MFN)
- Bayindir Insaat Turizm Ticaret VE Sanayi A.S. v Islamic Republic of Pakistan (ICSID Case No ARB/03/29) - (Contract and treaty claims; MFN; fair and equitable treatment).
- Daimler Financial Services AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/1) (Award on Jurisdiction) (www.practicallaw.com/9-521-2506) (Most favoured nation).
- Deutsche Bank AG v Sri Lanka (ICSID Case No ARB/09/02) (www.practicallaw.com/9-525-4681) (Definition of investment; Salini).
- EDF International SA and others v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/23) (www.practicallaw.com/8-520-6148) (MFN clause, umbrella clauses).
- Garanti Koza LLP v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No ARB/1120) (www.practicallaw.com/7-536-5208) (MFN; dispute resolution provisions)
- Hochtief AG v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/31) (www.practicallaw.com/9-511-1017) - (Investment treaty; MFN clauses; jurisdiction).
- ICS Inspection and Control Services Ltd (United Kingdom) v Argentine Republic (PCA Case No 2010-9) (www.practicallaw.com/9-518-2509) - (Jurisdiction; MFN clause; PCA)
- Impregilo SpA v Argentina Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/07/17) (www.practicallaw.com/8-506-8745) - (MFN clauses; dissenting opinion).
- Kiliç İnşaat İthalat İhracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Şirketi v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No ARB/10/01) (www.practicallaw.com/0-534-6497).
- Mr Tza Yap Shum v The Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No ARB/07/6) - (MFN clause; nationality requirements; interpretation of investment).
- Renta 4 SVSA v Russian Federation (Arbitration V 024/2007) (www.practicallaw.com/0-385-8579) - (SCC arbitration; BIT; MFN clause; fair and equitable treatment).
- RosInvestCo UK Ltd v The Russian Federation Case Number V 079/2005 (www.practicallaw.com/7-380-5974) - (Jurisdiction; MFN clause; BIT).
- Wintershall Aktiengesellschaft v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/04/14) (www.practicallaw.com/6-384-4626) - (MFN clause; BIT).
NAFTA
- Apotex Inc v United States, UNCITRAL (NAFTA) Procedural Order No 2 (www.practicallaw.com/9-516-9353) - (NAFTA; non-disputing parties submissions).
- Apotex Holdings Inc. and Apotex Inc. v United States of America, (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/1) (www.practicallaw.com/5-587-0185) - (NAFTA; Jurisdictional issues; Arbitral awards and challenges).
- Archer Daniels Midland Company and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas Inc v Mexico (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/04/05) (www.practicallaw.com/2-382-9350) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; counter-measures defence).
- Bayview Irrigation District et al v Mexico (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/05/1) (www.practicallaw.com/6-369-5971) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; foreign investments).
- Corn Products International, Inc v The United Mexican States (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/04/01) (www.practicallaw.com/6-385-6167) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; counter-measures defence).
- Grand River Enterprises et al. v United States of America, UNCITRAL (NAFTA) (www.practicallaw.com/7-504-8932) - (NAFTA; jurisdiction; foreign investment).
- Merrill & Ring Forestry LP v Canada (UNCITRAL, ICSID Administered Case (NAFTA)) - (NAFTA; fair and equitable treatment).
- St Mary’s VCNA v the Government of Canada (NAFTA/UNCITRAL) (www.practicallaw.com/5-526-7968) (Procedure; disclosure, legal privilege).
- United Parcel Service of America II v Government of Canada (11 June 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/4-369-9017) - (NAFTA Chapter 11; national treatment obligation).
- Vito G Gallo v Government of Canada (14 October 2009) - (NAFTA; Challenge to arbitrator; impartiality and independence).
Nationality requirement
- Mr Tza Yap Shum v The Republic of Peru (ICSID Case No ARB/07/6) - (MFN clause; nationality requirements; interpretation of investment).
- Saba Fakes v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB/07/20) - (Investment; nationality requirement).
Procedure
- Cambodia Power Company v Kingdom of Cambodia and another (ICSID Case No ARB/09/18) (www.practicallaw.com/9-525-7905) - (Multiple contracts; single arbitration proceeding).
- Emmis International Holding BV and others v Hungary (ICSID Case No ARB/12/2) (www.practicallaw.com/1-533-2249) (Bifurcation; jurisdictional phase).
- Forminster Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. Czech Republic, UNCITRAL (www.practicallaw.com/7-597-7265) - (Article 34(2), UNCITRAL Rules 1976; notice of withdrawal; arbitration not terminated).
- Frontier Petroleum Services Ltd v Czech Republic (Final award, PCA, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, 12 November 2010) (www.practicallaw.com/2-504-7459) - (BIT; public policy; enforcement).
- Giovanni Alemanni and Others v The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/8 (www.practicallaw.com/8-589-9045) - (Third party funding; Multi-party).
- Guaracachi America, Inc. and Rurelec PLC v The Plurinational State of Bolivia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2011-17 (www.practicallaw.com/8-557-4386) - (Multi-party; Joinder of BITs; Denial of benefits).
- Itera International Energy LLC and Itera Group NV v Georgia (ICSID Case No Arb/08/07) - (Ancillary claims).
- LG&E v Argentina (ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1) (www.practicallaw.com/7-382-8112) - (Supplementary decisions; ICSID Convention).
- Libananco Holdings Co Ltd v Republic of Turkey (ICSID Case No ARB/06/9) (www.practicallaw.com/2-382-8609) - (Interception of privileged communications).
- Railroad Development Corporation v Republic of Guatemala, (ICSID Case No ARB/07/23) (www.practicallaw.com/9-383-9992) - (Preserving evidence; ICSID).
Transparency and amicus curiae
- Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd v United Republic of Tanzania (ICSID Case No ARB/05/22) (Procedural Order No 5) (2 February 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/7-225-3964) - (Amicus curiae briefs; ICSID).
- Giovanna a Beccara and others v Argentina (ICSID Case No. ARB/07/05) - (Confidentiality; ICSID Convention).
- Piero Foresti, Laura de Carli and others v Republic of South Africa (ICSID Case No ARB (AF)/07/1) - (ICSID; non-disputing parties; amicus curiae).
- Suez and others v The Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/19) (Order in response to a petition by five NGOs for permission to make an amicus brief) (12 February 2007) (www.practicallaw.com/7-223-1967) - (Amicus curiae briefs; NGOs; investment treaty arbitration).
Treaty interpretation
- Churchill Mining Plc v Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No ARB/12/14) (www.practicallaw.com/0-559-2285) - (Treaty interpretation; Vienna Convention).
- Hrvatska Elektroprivreda DD v The Republic of Slovenia (ICSID Case No ARB/05/24) (www.practicallaw.com/3-386-4833) - (Treaty interpretation; Vienna Convention).
- Kilic Insaat Ithalat Ihracat Sanayi ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Turkmenistan (ICSID Case No. ARB/10/1) (www.practicallaw.com/7-519-7724) - (Inconsistencies in language of BIT texts)
- Planet Mining Pty Ltd v Republic of Indonesia (ICSID Case No ARB/12/40) (www.practicallaw.com/0-559-2285) - (Treaty interpretation; Vienna Convention).
Umbrella clause
- Bosh International Inc and another v Ukraine (ICSID Case No ARB/08/11) (www.practicallaw.com/6-522-2941) (Umbrella clause; breach of a contract; non-party).
- Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) (www.practicallaw.com/7-522-1352) (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; stay; local court proceedings).
- Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessment and Control, BIVAC BV v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/9) - (Jurisdiction; umbrella clause; admissibility).
- Burlington Resources Inc v Republic of Ecuador (ICSID Case No ARB 08/5) (www.practicallaw.com/9-523-4754) (Privity; jurisdiction; umbrella clause).
- EDF International SA and others v Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No ARB/03/23) (www.practicallaw.com/8-520-6148) (MFN clause, umbrella clauses).
- Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Republic of Ghana (ICSID Case No ARB/07/24) (www.practicallaw.com/4-503-5323) - (Contractual claims; BIT).
- Ioan Micula and others v Romania (ICSID Case No. ARB/05/20) (www.practicallaw.com/0-554-4685) (Fair and equitable treatment standard; umbrella clause; EU law).
- Sempra v Argentina (ICSID Case No ARB 02/16) (www.practicallaw.com/1-376-6273) - (BIT; fair and equitable treatment; umbrella clause).
- SGS Societe Generale de Surveillance SA v The Republic of Paraguay (ICSID Case No ARB/07/29) (www.practicallaw.com/8-518-5344) - (Obligations under investment contract; umbrella clause).
Source: http://uk.practicallaw.com/4-518-1668?q=icsid+enforcement+problems
☑️DO YOU WANT TO RECOVER YOUR LOST FUNDS ON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, BITCOIN INVESTMENTS, AND OTHER SCAM TRADING INVESTMENTS ??? TAKE YOUR TIME TO READ🔘
ReplyDelete☑️ The COMPOSITE CYBER SECURITY SPECIALISTS have received numerous complaints of fraud associated with websites that offers opportunities for Capital Investments, bitcoin investments and Trading on an Internet-based trading platforms. Most Of The complaints falls into these Two categories:
1. 🔘Refusal to credit customers accounts or reimburse funds to customers:
These complaints typically involve customers who have deposited money into their trading or investment account and who are then encouraged by “brokers” over the telephone to deposit additional funds into the customer account. When customers later attempt to withdraw their original deposit or the return they have been promised, the trading platforms allegedly cancels customers’ withdrawal requests, refuse to credit their accounts, or ignore their telephone calls and emails.
2. 🔘Manipulation of software to generate losing trades:
These complaints allege that the Internet-based Investment and trading platforms manipulate the trading software to distort the Trading prices and payouts in order to ensure that the trade results in a Loss. For example, when a customer’s trade is “winning,” the countdown to expiration is extended arbitrarily until the trade becomes a loss.
☑️ Most people have lost their hard earned money through Scam Investments And Trading, yet they would go and meet fake recovery Experts unknowingly to help them recover their money and they would end up losing more money in the process. This Is Basically why we (COMPOSITE CYBER SECURITY SPECIALISTS) have come to y’all victim’s rescue. The clue is most of these Brokers have weak Database security, and their vulnerabilities can be exploited easily with the Help of our Special HackTools, Root HackTools And Technical Hacking Strategies because they wouldn’t wanna spend money in the sponsorship of Bug bounty Programs which would have helped protect their Database from Unauthorized access to their Database, So all our specialists do is to hack into the Broker’s Database via SQL Hook injections & DNS Spoofing, Decrypt your Transaction Details, Trace the Routes of your Deposited Funds, Then some Technical Hacking Algorithms & Execution Which we cant explain here would follow then you have your money recovered. 💰 ✔️
☑️All our Specialists are well experienced in their various niches with Great Skills, Technical Hacking Strategies And Positive Online Reputations And Recommendations🔘
They hail from a proven track record and have cracked even the toughest of barriers to intrude and capture all relevant data needed by our Clients.
We have Digital Forensic Specialists, Certified Ethical Hackers, Software Engineers, Cyber Security Experts, Private investigators and more. Our Goal is to make your digital life secure, safe and hassle free by Linking you Up With these great Professionals such as JACK CABLE, ARNE SWINNEN, SEAN MELIA, DAWID CZAGAN, BEN SADEGHIPOUR And More. These Professionals are Well Reserved Professionals who are always ready to Handle your job with great energy and swift response so that your problems can be solved very quickly.
All You Need to Do is to send us a mail and we’ll Assign any of these specialists to Handle your Job immediately.
☑️ Below Is A Full List Of Our Services:
* FUNDS RECOVERY ON INVESTMENT AND TRADING.
* WEBSITE HACKING
* CREDIT REPAIR.
* PHONE HACKING (giving you Unnoticeable access to everything Happening on the Target’s Phone)
* CLEARING OF CRIMINAL RECORDS
* SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS HACKING
☑️ CONTACT:
••• Email:
composite.cybersecurity@protonmail.com
🔘2020 © composite cybersecurity specialists
🔘Want faster service? Contact us!
🔘All Rights Reserved ®️